“Doctor ka beta doctor,
politician ka beta politician
aur Director ka betaDirector
Actor banega”
If you are born in a Bollywood family, you would want the largest share of the glamour pie, wouldn’t you?
Do they succeed or end up dragging their careers with their last names? The results are there for everyone to see.
But Dynasty system in Bollywood is a topic for some other time.
For now, let’s discuss about the direction or at times, misdirection part of film making.
A director plays the most important role in any video production that we see on screen.
Be it a television commercial or a feature film, Director is the captain of the ship.
But do they always call the shots? Not really.
There are various external forces, working around them, that influence their work.
It’s not always that these forces be able to gain importance in a director’s work but when they do, they do it as follows:
Actors: An actor is as good as his director wants him to be. But it is not always that an actor would want himself to be projected in a certain way.
There are a lot of egos at work. And at times, these egos dictate terms for the director.
If you are a well-known face in the industry, you will come on board for your face value and your fan following. That gives you an upper hand in how things go on and off set.
Working with big stars can help your career. However, if you are not an influential director, stars can hijack your vision. At the same time, it is easier to work with new comers in a way but again, you have to spend that extra time and efforts with them. But as a director, it should not matter to you. Be it a mega star or a new comer, you have to bring them down in the ground to get the output you want.
However, it’s easier said than done.
Directors gets thrown off a project because the ‘star’ did not want him on board.
Directors do not get the necessary funds they need because the ‘star’ cast has eaten up the major chunk of the allocated budgets.
We blame the director and his storytelling skills for something that’s not up to the mark but we fail to realise that at times, his / her hands are bound by what’s at stake for them.
No one wants to be in the bad books of a famous actor.
Directors’ line up outside the doors of these stars so they can kick start their project.
Not all actors are a pleasure to work with. At times, they become a thorn in the flesh.
Studios / Financiers: They are the ones with the money. They sign you cheques. They have risked their (investors) money on your vision. And more often than not, you will have to bow down in front of them. They will have their say in the star cast. They will force you to put up a nonsensical item songs for “promotions”. They will do whatever they can to force their money making tools into your work and at times, will end up destroying it all. They want to make big money. For their bosses and for themselves.
But can we blame them? Every investor wants his money back, don’t they?
People would not want to invest in a content that can bring a backlash from the society or monetary returns.
They would not want to fund a film that may end up with an ‘A’ certificate because it will hamper their collections.
They would not want to invest into something that can prove to be ‘controversial’ for a few sections of the society.
And they would certainly not want to invest into something that can hurt the ‘sentiments’ of people watching the film.
I am not saying that a director would purposely want to do all of the above.
However, if a story has to be narrated in a particular way in order for it to be honest, there is nothing that should restrict a director. Wishful thinking, indeed.
We need to understand that there is no fix formula for success in this field.
As a director, you have to keep in mind the recoverability of funds. But it should not be the only driving force.
A well-funded will with all the right elements of a hit can turn out to be a disaster.
At the same time, a low budget film can end up making its mark.
Presence of misfits amongst the lot that controls the money has led to a situation where there is a major crisis of funds. And they have no one but themselves to blame for it.
Audience: We are the most important factor that influences everything that’s being shown on the screen and are responsible for what’s been shown.
With the quality of content being shown on television, films and other medium, it’s safe to say that we are a really bad influence.
Our social structure has not evolved in a way to accept new and path breaking content.
On television, the normal audience would still want to watch a drama between saas and her bahu. They would still want to watch a fictional character out for revenge. They would still want to watch reality shows which have no reality left in them.
When it comes to film, they would want to watch it because of the star cast in it. Everything else is just irrelevant. They would not even know the name of the director but would surely know the dance steps of the actor by heart.
How do we change the mind-set of the audience?
It’s a collective effort. Let a studio decide to not fund contentless projects. Let an actor decide not to take up the same stereotype project and let the known directors of the industry step up and tell revenant stories.
With the growth of digital platform in the country, there is some hope left. But with the majority of audience still in their cocoons, we can never be too sure.
It’s the majority of audience that will dictate the type of content that will be shown on screen.
A director can either be a part of this rat race or can take a stand of his own.
But it’s not every day that we see a director put his / her foot down and will not let his / her vision be tainted by the prevailing mediocrity.
But if we look at the other side of things, a person is already overloaded with the reality of things happening around him / her. They would want cinema / TV to be a medium that can divert their minds from it all. This makes it even more important for the film makers to create content that is appealing yet relevant.
politician ka beta politician
aur Director ka beta
Actor banega”
If you are born in a Bollywood family, you would want the largest share of the glamour pie, wouldn’t you?
Do they succeed or end up dragging their careers with their last names? The results are there for everyone to see.
But Dynasty system in Bollywood is a topic for some other time.
For now, let’s discuss about the direction or at times, misdirection part of film making.
A director plays the most important role in any video production that we see on screen.
Be it a television commercial or a feature film, Director is the captain of the ship.
But do they always call the shots? Not really.
There are various external forces, working around them, that influence their work.
It’s not always that these forces be able to gain importance in a director’s work but when they do, they do it as follows:
Actors: An actor is as good as his director wants him to be. But it is not always that an actor would want himself to be projected in a certain way.
There are a lot of egos at work. And at times, these egos dictate terms for the director.
If you are a well-known face in the industry, you will come on board for your face value and your fan following. That gives you an upper hand in how things go on and off set.
Working with big stars can help your career. However, if you are not an influential director, stars can hijack your vision. At the same time, it is easier to work with new comers in a way but again, you have to spend that extra time and efforts with them. But as a director, it should not matter to you. Be it a mega star or a new comer, you have to bring them down in the ground to get the output you want.
However, it’s easier said than done.
Directors gets thrown off a project because the ‘star’ did not want him on board.
Directors do not get the necessary funds they need because the ‘star’ cast has eaten up the major chunk of the allocated budgets.
We blame the director and his storytelling skills for something that’s not up to the mark but we fail to realise that at times, his / her hands are bound by what’s at stake for them.
No one wants to be in the bad books of a famous actor.
Directors’ line up outside the doors of these stars so they can kick start their project.
Not all actors are a pleasure to work with. At times, they become a thorn in the flesh.
Studios / Financiers: They are the ones with the money. They sign you cheques. They have risked their (investors) money on your vision. And more often than not, you will have to bow down in front of them. They will have their say in the star cast. They will force you to put up a nonsensical item songs for “promotions”. They will do whatever they can to force their money making tools into your work and at times, will end up destroying it all. They want to make big money. For their bosses and for themselves.
But can we blame them? Every investor wants his money back, don’t they?
People would not want to invest in a content that can bring a backlash from the society or monetary returns.
They would not want to fund a film that may end up with an ‘A’ certificate because it will hamper their collections.
They would not want to invest into something that can prove to be ‘controversial’ for a few sections of the society.
And they would certainly not want to invest into something that can hurt the ‘sentiments’ of people watching the film.
I am not saying that a director would purposely want to do all of the above.
However, if a story has to be narrated in a particular way in order for it to be honest, there is nothing that should restrict a director. Wishful thinking, indeed.
We need to understand that there is no fix formula for success in this field.
As a director, you have to keep in mind the recoverability of funds. But it should not be the only driving force.
A well-funded will with all the right elements of a hit can turn out to be a disaster.
At the same time, a low budget film can end up making its mark.
Presence of misfits amongst the lot that controls the money has led to a situation where there is a major crisis of funds. And they have no one but themselves to blame for it.
Audience: We are the most important factor that influences everything that’s being shown on the screen and are responsible for what’s been shown.
With the quality of content being shown on television, films and other medium, it’s safe to say that we are a really bad influence.
Our social structure has not evolved in a way to accept new and path breaking content.
On television, the normal audience would still want to watch a drama between saas and her bahu. They would still want to watch a fictional character out for revenge. They would still want to watch reality shows which have no reality left in them.
When it comes to film, they would want to watch it because of the star cast in it. Everything else is just irrelevant. They would not even know the name of the director but would surely know the dance steps of the actor by heart.
How do we change the mind-set of the audience?
It’s a collective effort. Let a studio decide to not fund contentless projects. Let an actor decide not to take up the same stereotype project and let the known directors of the industry step up and tell revenant stories.
With the growth of digital platform in the country, there is some hope left. But with the majority of audience still in their cocoons, we can never be too sure.
It’s the majority of audience that will dictate the type of content that will be shown on screen.
A director can either be a part of this rat race or can take a stand of his own.
But it’s not every day that we see a director put his / her foot down and will not let his / her vision be tainted by the prevailing mediocrity.
But if we look at the other side of things, a person is already overloaded with the reality of things happening around him / her. They would want cinema / TV to be a medium that can divert their minds from it all. This makes it even more important for the film makers to create content that is appealing yet relevant.
I tried seeking answers to a few questions that have always
lingered around in my head.
A few of them are as follows:
Q: Why would someone want to be a Director?
A: It’s a personal choice. For some people it’s a career choice they make subconsciously while pursuing a career in the industry. For others, the hunger to tell stories from their point of view acts as the motivating factor.
A few of them are as follows:
Q: Why would someone want to be a Director?
A: It’s a personal choice. For some people it’s a career choice they make subconsciously while pursuing a career in the industry. For others, the hunger to tell stories from their point of view acts as the motivating factor.
Q: Is it glamorous?
A: Depends on one’s definition of glamor. It is satisfying for sure. But if it’s glamour that you seek, maybe direction is not for you.
Q: Where do the new comers start at?
A: There are various institutes that teach you the very basis of direction. But they cannot teach you film making. One can gain the basic knowledge but will need the practical training. Start assisting directors and learn as much as you can before you are confident enough to tell a story from your perspective.
Q: What qualities should one possess to be a director?
A: It’s your natural instincts that drive you in this direction. You have to be a good reader. Not necessarily a good writer but you should be able to put your story across in a way that keeps the viewers engaged. Apart from this, one should have the sense for acting, art direction, music, lighting, camera angles, frames so on and so forth. At the end of the day, when you are directing, you are directing everything that goes around on a set.
A: Depends on one’s definition of glamor. It is satisfying for sure. But if it’s glamour that you seek, maybe direction is not for you.
Q: Where do the new comers start at?
A: There are various institutes that teach you the very basis of direction. But they cannot teach you film making. One can gain the basic knowledge but will need the practical training. Start assisting directors and learn as much as you can before you are confident enough to tell a story from your perspective.
Q: What qualities should one possess to be a director?
A: It’s your natural instincts that drive you in this direction. You have to be a good reader. Not necessarily a good writer but you should be able to put your story across in a way that keeps the viewers engaged. Apart from this, one should have the sense for acting, art direction, music, lighting, camera angles, frames so on and so forth. At the end of the day, when you are directing, you are directing everything that goes around on a set.
Q: Can cinema change the way people think?
A: Not really. It is not a tool for a social / political change. The best cinema can do is mirror the happenings around us. People seek entertainment. A social / political message cannot overshadow the entertainment quotient.
A: Not really. It is not a tool for a social / political change. The best cinema can do is mirror the happenings around us. People seek entertainment. A social / political message cannot overshadow the entertainment quotient.
In the end, I would want to admit that a Director is not
always right.
Certain works are genuinely bad and they cannot blame anyone else but themselves.
After a certain high point in their career, their preference shift. And unfortunately, the industry has such characters in abundance.
Many try to hide behind an absurd comparison between “commercial” and “art” cinema.
I totally disagree with such comparisons. A film is either good or bad, full stop.
I, personally as a part of the audience, look up to the directors to bring about a change in the kind of content that has been dumped on us. However, it cannot happen overnight.
“Revolution is not an event. It’s a process”
Certain works are genuinely bad and they cannot blame anyone else but themselves.
After a certain high point in their career, their preference shift. And unfortunately, the industry has such characters in abundance.
Many try to hide behind an absurd comparison between “commercial” and “art” cinema.
I totally disagree with such comparisons. A film is either good or bad, full stop.
I, personally as a part of the audience, look up to the directors to bring about a change in the kind of content that has been dumped on us. However, it cannot happen overnight.
“Revolution is not an event. It’s a process”
Andddd cut....